Recent Updates
January 08, 2012
Oregon Construction Defect Claims After Abraham
December 27, 2011
Portland Trust Dispute Attorney's Trust Litigation 101 Series
December 22, 2011
Trust Dispute Litigation 101: The Basics of a Trust Dispute
December 20, 2011
Smart and Proactive Brand Protection is Critical for Oregon and Washington Businesses
December 19, 2011
Return and Exchange Policies: Thinking Through the Policy is Good For Business
Archives
December, 2011
October, 2011
September, 2011
August, 2011
July, 2011
June, 2011
May, 2011
February, 2011
October, 2010
August, 2010
Web Resources
FindLaw
Thomson West
U.S. Courts
Oregon Courts
Washington Courts
Westlaw
United States Chamber of Commerce
FirstGov
Library of Congress
White House
Internal Revenue Service
Oregon State Bar
Oregon Trial Lawyers Assoc.
Multnomah Bar Association
American Bar Association
Oregonian
Portland Business Journal
Willamette Week
Portland Mercury
Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Seattle Times
Puget Sound Business Journal
Seattle Weekly
Wall Street Journal
New York Times
Yahoo!Legal Blog Directory
Oregon Entrepreneurs Network
8 – Business Incubator
Portland Trust Dispute Attorney's Trust Litigation 101 Series
Posted by: Phil Nelson
December 27, 2011
Topic: Business Litigation & Arbitration
Last week, we posted the first entry in the Slinde Nelson primer on trust dispute litigation. Trusts are a powerful tool for estate planning, but they can be confusing not only to the settlor (the person who creates the trust) but to the beneficiaries of the trust. Some of that confusions is unavoidable for more complicated financial trusts. But, as a Portland trust dispute attorney, I can tell you that much of the confusion can be avoided through a very rudimentary understanding of how trusts work.
The first entry in this series defined what a trustee is. This entry discusses what a trustee does.
In the most basic sense, a trustee carries out the desires of the settlor as outlined in the trust document. What does this mean? The trustee is charged with using their best efforts to meet the terms of the trust. But, what if the trustee cannot discern the intent of the settlor? The standard is one of reasonableness. A trustee who manages the trust reasonably and interprets its terms according to the same standard is likely to have complied with their fiduciary duties to the beneficiaries.a
Specifically, trustees manage the assets of the trust, including maximizing profit and overseeing dispersal when the time comes. Often, the trustee serves over the estate of a deceased individual. Sometimes the trustee is a family friend, sometimes it is a professional, like an attorney or someone who serves as a trustee for a living.
Trust litigation in Seattle or Portland, or anywhere for that matter, is a result of several of the factors I just described. Any time you are trying to interpret the intent of a deceased person and manage assets for that person's beneficiaries, the potential for disputes arises.

